The Impact of the 65-Game Rule on NBA Awards: Who's In and Who's Out
The controversial 65-game rule in the NBA continues to stir debate as players grapple with eligibility for end-of-season awards. This regulation requires players to participate in at least 65 regular-season games to qualify, with notable exceptions for certain awards. As the season progresses, several high-profile players find themselves sidelined, impacting their chances for accolades. Key players affected include: Isaiah Stewart of the Detroit Pistons expressed concerns on March 10, shortly before a calf injury hindered his eligibility for Defensive Player of the Year. Cade Cunningham has been ruled out for Most Valuable Player and All-NBA honors due to a collapsed lung, which has kept him off the court since March 13. Anthony Edwards was disqualified after missing a game on March 30, while Luka Dončić faces a similar fate due to a Grade 2 hamstring strain but may seek an exemption due to extraordinary circumstances surrounding his personal life. The rule, however, does not apply to Sixth Man of the Year, Rookie of the Year, All-Rookie, or Clutch Player of the Year. Players must log at least 20 minutes in a game to count toward eligibility, with allowances for limited play in a maximum of two games. As the awards race heats up, several candidates remain in contention: Victor Wembanyama has only missed two games and needs to participate in two of the remaining four to qualify. Kawhi Leonard is on a tight schedule with only one game of wiggle room left. Deni Avdija must avoid further injuries to stay in the running for Most Improved Player, where competition remains fierce. The NBA Players Association has voiced dissatisfaction, calling for a reassessment of the rule, highlighting its potential to undermine player careers and achievements. As the season winds down, the landscape of award eligibility continues to shift, leaving fans and players alike questioning the fairness of the current system.
Source: CBS Sports - 2026-04-06